Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Voting for neither one

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Andara Bledin
    replied
    Originally posted by Ipecac Drano View Post
    So, you agree that there is the option of The Least of Available Evils? Really, I have yet to see two candidates that I cannot choose between. I always manage to find some tipping point between them.
    There will always be a lesser evil, but that is irrelevant to my statement and others' comments.

    Just because one candidate might not be as evil as all the rest, that doesn't mean that they're automatically "good" enough to deserve a person's vote.

    ^-.-^

    Leave a comment:


  • bhskittykatt
    replied
    If there's an independent candidate, see if you like them. Otherwise, cast a blank ballot.

    If you don't vote, you lose all complaining rights, IMHO. I take my voting responsibility seriously. If you don't like the candidates, send a blank vote, or a write-in. At least that way, you've sent your message and you've earned the right to complain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ipecac Drano
    replied
    Originally posted by Andara Bledin View Post
    Sometimes, all available options suck. At that point you either go with a write-in, vote for the least of available evils, or you leave that post unvoted to indicate your displeasure with all options.
    So, you agree that there is the option of The Least of Available Evils? Really, I have yet to see two candidates that I cannot choose between. I always manage to find some tipping point between them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andara Bledin
    replied
    Originally posted by Ipecac Drano View Post
    There is always a better choice. People who say that they're not going to vote because "all politicians are crooks" or some other variant are just too lazy to do a little research to see which one is telling the truth.
    Nice blanket statement, there.

    Sometimes, all available options suck. At that point you either go with a write-in, vote for the least of available evils, or you leave that post unvoted to indicate your displeasure with all options.

    ^-.-^

    Leave a comment:


  • MadMike
    replied
    Originally posted by Millahtyme1983 View Post
    Another alternative is the write in which as the name implies you write in whomever you want.
    I only ever did that once. It was for township commissioner. The guy who currently held the position was the same asshole who, years ago, had bought the building I was renting, and then kicked me and my then-5-year-old son out right before Christmas, because his wife wanted it for themselves, and apparently didn't care who they were kicking out.

    I went in to vote, intending to vote for whoever was running against him, but wouldn't you know it? He was running unopposed. So I wrote in "Bart Simpson."

    I only wish I had known he'd end up running for office when he kicked us out. I would have saved the letter he sent me, and gone to the paper with it. I'm sure everyone would just love him if they knew he had kicked out a single dad and his young son out of their home right before Christmas. Unfortunately, by the time I found out he was running for office, I had thrown the letter away.

    Oh well, karma can be a real bitch, and I hope the fucking roof falls in on his head.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ipecac Drano
    replied
    There is always a better choice. People who say that they're not going to vote because "all politicians are crooks" or some other variant are just too lazy to do a little research to see which one is telling the truth.

    If one doesn't vote, one shouldn't complain.
    Last edited by Ipecac Drano; 10-24-2010, 02:40 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Millahtyme1983
    replied
    You can, it's called "blanking" and it's a way of saying that you do not like the choices. Another alternative is the write in which as the name implies you write in whomever you want.

    Some might say it's throwing your vote away but one thing potential candidates look at is how many blanks and write-ins there were in the last election, if say in a race for state rep the guy that won did it with 53% of the vote but there were a 10% showing of blank ballots it indicates that he is not as popular as the vote would make him seem, and most of his votes were possibly just people voting against his opponent (blanks are not counted in the tally, so his opponent would have 47%) Because of this he could theoretically be taken down if a strong candidate were to face him in the next election. So by blanking your not throwing your vote away since either way one of them is going to win whether you vote for them or not, by blanking you are letting them know that they are venerable. That is the theory anyway.
    Last edited by Millahtyme1983; 10-24-2010, 02:07 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bright Star
    started a topic Voting for neither one

    Voting for neither one

    Let's say you have two people running for public office. They go on the air for weeks on end with one negative thing after the other. You don't like either one of them cause one seems like he wouldn't know what he'd be doing & the other seems too creepy for words. Now, when you go vote, can you NOT vote for either one of them?
    Seems to me that if you have 2 bad choices then it's like having no choice at all.
Working...
X