While it's not restricted to one side of politics, candidates on the same 'side' will attack each other, often with far greater ferocity, when they are campaigning for the same spot.
Consider this blog post on the recent Kentucky primary.
Basically, an outside runner got a big donation and managed to get elected. The other GOP candidates are... pissy.
It happened in Australia recently too. In 2007, the conservative gov was voted out. The Labor party was led by a guy called Rudd, who even though he managed to boot out a government that had been in power for a decade, still managed to piss away any support he had in his own party and was usurped by his deputy.
Recently, he tried getting his old job back - and didn't that bring out the vitriol. The level of hatred displayed was incredible, and is one of the reasons that support for the current government is so low.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Just what is up with the Republican party in the US?
Collapse
X
-
A significant chunk of the party will after what he's said the last couple of days, if they didn't already.Don't the Republicans hate Powell these days?
Or, at least, they would if he were running for president. Since he's not anything official anymore, most probably don't care.
Leave a comment:
-
The difference is neither of these men became President and even if Herman Cain did, he still wouldn't be the FIRST Black President.Originally posted by Fire_on_High View PostBaloney. Herman Cain ring any bells? Colin Powell? Both have been discussed and the general consensus is either would have made a fine president.
We oppose his policy, not his skin.
When Obama got elected a whole bunch of people collectively crapped their pants upon realizing: "Oh shit, the President of the United States is no longer guaranteed to be an old white guy with a normal sounding name."
Obama's election shattered the norm and also led to the hypothesis that with the election of Obama that blacks and minorities were on their way to taking over the country and eventually suppressing the white man.
I can guarantee you if Obama was the same in every respect EXCEPT he was white skinned and named "Brian Miller" he wouldn't get one TENTH of the flack he gets now, especially from the right wing.
Interestingly, a survey was recently released suggesting viewers who watch ONLY Fox News actually do worse on general political questions than people who watch NO NEWS AT ALL.Originally posted by crashhelmet View PostEducation, yet another thing the Republican party is attacking.
http://news.yahoo.com/survey-no-news...161316184.htmlLast edited by Crazedclerkthe2nd; 05-29-2012, 08:19 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
exactly. i can't recall (and if you can find an instance, i'm happy to admit i'm wrong) a single instance in the history of the u.s. in which a white presidential candidate has had his citizenship questioned.Originally posted by Silverharp View PostThen how do you explain the constant flow of "He's a Kenyan Muslim! quick, Impeach him!"
Leave a comment:
-
Education, yet another thing the Republican party is attacking.Originally posted by bara View PostI blame lack of education for the republican party.
A country thrives when the people thrive.
Leave a comment:
-
Then how do you explain the constant flow of "He's a Kenyan Muslim! quick, Impeach him!"Originally posted by Fire_on_High View PostBaloney. Herman Cain ring any bells? Colin Powell? Both have been discussed and the general consensus is either would have made a fine president.
We oppose his policy, not his skin.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm talking in reference to the election strategy. Obama's Election plan in 2008 was essentially "let's stop the partisan BS and work together to get shit done". This time around it's "we tried to work with them, and they chose not to. So now we're going to take the house and get shit done without them."
Leave a comment:
-
Obama tried to play nice with the Republicans at first, aiming to dissolve the deep divide between the two parties so they could work together to get shit done, despite the fact that he had a supermajority and didn't have to.Originally posted by Rapscallion View PostEven the Obama camp is negative in campaigning, though the guy himself comes across as being far more constructive.
The republican response to this was essentially "hell no! we won't go!" So stuff got stonewalled and the republicans were making it out to be Obama's fault entirely when the only thing he did that caused the stonewall was to try and work with both parties. So during the midterms the dems lot a lot of seats and gave majority in congress to the republicans, who have continued stonewalling and blaming Obama for it.
I think this time around Obama realized that they're too far gone to be reasoned with and said "fuck em".
Leave a comment:
-
I blame lack of education for the republican party.
A country thrives when the people thrive.
Leave a comment:
-
I am so fed up with the Republican Party. It simply has no redeeming values.
It's even worse to see some of the people who support the party: middle class, lower economic class, ethnic minorities, women, and a few others. This party works overtime at implementing policies that shoot all of these groups in the foot, yet many members of these groups keep supporting it.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't like everything that Obama has done, but I'll be voting for him. I mean, the other options are Romney, who would ruin our economy in a matter of weeks, and Paul, who has abhorrent social policies.
Leave a comment:
-
I was pretty damn sure I was going to be voting Republican this election cycle. Then I saw the candidates. The Republicans have the most piss-poor showing of unelectable people they've had in years, maybe ever.
So I'm currently undecided. There's a very real chance I'll be voting for Obama, but I don't know yet. Either way, like Raps said, it's pretty much a matter of choosing the person I dislike the least.
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds like the decision is based on the least worst option, right? From the perspective over here, he's not a bad president, but I get the feeling that he's very much bouyed by the sheer vileness of most of his opposition.Originally posted by MadMike View PostI've always said that both parties are equally horrible, and I've often condemned people who seem to think their party could do no wrong, and the opposite party could do no right. But lately, the people calling themselves republicans are scaring the hell out of me. I voted for Obama last time around, and I would have considered voting against him this time, if it wasn't for the fact that all the people who were running against him were bat-shit crazy. Romney's probably the least crazy of the bunch, but the more I hear about him, the less I like about him, so chances are I'm voting for Obama again.
I think what really does it for me is that everything is so negative about the campaigning, but the Republicans seem to be the most dedicated to bile and vitriol rather than anything constructive or even debating. Even the Obama camp is negative in campaigning, though the guy himself comes across as being far more constructive.
That said, when your opposition is leaving open such huge gaps in their armour in the way that the Republicans are, then it's hard not to give them a slap now and then.
Rapscallion
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Crazedclerkthe2nd View PostThe short answer to your question Raps is: because a black man is President.Herman Cain was a joke candidate and was never meant to be taken seriously.Originally posted by Fire_on_High View PostBaloney. Herman Cain ring any bells? Colin Powell? Both have been discussed and the general consensus is either would have made a fine president.
We oppose his policy, not his skin.
Don't the Republicans hate Powell these days?
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: