If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Leave it to humanity to always vote against their own best interests.
See also the people of New Orleans re-electing Mayor Ray "Chocolate City" Nagin and William "Dollar Bill" Jefferson in the past. Ditto people of my native state re-electing Governor Edwards, or the country, Bill Clinton. Some of those men are now convicted felons because of things they did in office...My guess is that, when it comes down to election time, people remember those names. That counts for a lot.
Once the kid is born, you can't be forced to donate blood to save its life, much less anything more strenuous. You can't be forced to donate blood to a baby you just shot that is dying of blood loss, ffs.
Forced pregnancy does not automatically follow from declaring a zygote a person- people have zero rights to use of another's body without consent. It's a bad argument, when the only time being a person gives you access to the body of an unwilling person is when you are the size of a pencile raser.
Dumb, dumb, dumb for making the original statement. After all, an established convention in biology, when you have one organism referred to as a "host", is for the other organism to be a parasite. Perfectly natural for a host to want to get rid of a parasite.
I am wondering if that's actually the point he was trying to make. Every so often, I hear the argument from the pro-choice side that because the fetus or embryo is technically a "parasite" it's perfectly okay to terminate it. I always wince at that argument because it's a horrible way to describe a wanted pregnancy.
Calling the mother a "host" would be a counter to that description, which makes me wince just as much.
"Once a child does exist in your womb, I'm not going to assume a right to kill it just because the child's host (some refer to them as mothers) doesn't want it."
He backpedaled right quick, and changed "host" to "bearer of the child," but he's still marginalizing the actual person in favor of a potential one.
Dumb, dumb, dumb for making the original statement. After all, an established convention in biology, when you have one organism referred to as a "host", is for the other organism to be a parasite. Perfectly natural for a host to want to get rid of a parasite.
"What's the difference between Hillary Clinton and a catfish. One has whiskers and stinks, and the other is a fish."
-- private-equity executive Paul Queally at the Wall Street secret society Kappa Beta Phi annual dinner
"What's the biggest difference between Barney Frank and a Fenway frank? Barney Frank comes in different-size buns."
-- Paul Queally
"In Wall Street land we'll take our stand, said Morgan and Goldman. But first we better get some loans, so quick, get to the Fed, man."
-- investment banker Warren Stephens, while wearing a Confederate cap, to the tune of "Dixie"
"Can you fuckin' believe Lasry up there? He just gave me a ride in his jet a month ago."
-- Fortress Investment Group founder Michael Novogratz, at the same dinner
"I believe that God has a plan for all of us. I believe my plan involves a seven-figure bonus."
-- new society members, singing to the tune of "I Believe"
"What happens at the St. Regis stays at the St. Regis."
-- Kappa Beta Phi motto
Ladies and gentlemen, the assholes the GOP defends.
anyway, onto what Senator Martin said: dude, the issue seems to be that you believe the kid deserves rights from the moment of conception. I believe rights partially attach when the kid is viable- as in, can exist outside the mother with medical intervention- and the rest attach at birth. ( basically, I see ti as abortion for any reason being permissible until the kid is viable (albeit if the parent just doesn't want the kid, I do support warning them that it is irreversible- that if you change your mind, you have to get pregnant again) and abortion due to maternal health issues being permissible whenever)
but since a lot of people do most of their shopping at the same place... also, they might not be able to find out specifics, but they can guess surprising amounts. (back in 1999, they could figure out how many kids you have, what pet you have, and a couple other things. Remember recently, Target got into trouble because their targeted adverts were getting a little too accurate? it's the same principle analysis of shopping patterns.)
my point if that google analysing what you search for is merely an extension of what other companies are doing already.
Well, when I meant creepy I meant as in a stalker vibe. I'm aware this exists and frankly the ones who tend to bitch about it the loudest will turn around and post a selfie of their new purchase on facebook. My take is that he could have handed it off to a PR person to not make it sound like he's watching me in my sleep.
They can, up to a point. They don't know what you're getting from other stores, nor necessarily what you're doing even with what you buy from them. Or, for that matter, that the person using the card is the one who signed up for it.
but since a lot of people do most of their shopping at the same place... also, they might not be able to find out specifics, but they can guess surprising amounts. (back in 1999, they could figure out how many kids you have, what pet you have, and a couple other things. Remember recently, Target got into trouble because their targeted adverts were getting a little too accurate? it's the same principle analysis of shopping patterns.)
my point if that google analysing what you search for is merely an extension of what other companies are doing already.
"I don't expect to be in the room or will I do anything to prevent you from obtaining a contraceptive. However, once a child does exist in your womb, I'm not going to assume a right to kill it just because the child's host (some refer to them as mothers) doesn't want it."
—
VA state Sen. Steve Martin, in response to a Valentine's Day card asking him to protect women's reproductive health options including contraception and safe, legal abortion
Full quote of what Andrea posted earlier. Doesn't really help his case.
Leave a comment: