Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The old evolution debate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jackfaire View Post
    It sounds more like he is separating human the species and Man the culture.

    Until a certain point we were simply another "dumb" animal living in nature then something happened and we put a piece of sharpened flint on a stick, lit a fire and started in small ways controlling more of nature than our cousins could.
    Originally posted by mikoyan29 View Post
    I think that is about right.
    Ok. I can agree with that. Humans are still animals; we're just animals who use tools really well and have languages that are more sophisticated than most other animals.
    "The future is always born in pain... If we are wise what is born of that pain matures into the promise of a better world." --G'Kar, "Babylon 5"

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Andara Bledin View Post
      our particular branch wasn't as advanced
      'Advanced' implies a goal. It implies direction and progress. A species can be more numerous than another, it can reproduce more successfully than another, it can even, veering into dangerous territory here, be more 'fit' than another, as long as you make sure to describe what that 'fitness' entails(generally reproductive success).

      It cannot be more advanced than another, unless you're going to posit an example of an ending species for it to advance towards.

      Comment

      Working...
      X