Hooters is being sued by National Organization of Women

[Rapscallion]

Hmm, sue it to what end? Suing for money? Suing to make them stop serving children?

The main effect of this would be to reduce the offerings available on offer, and thus require fewer staff, reducing emplyment opportunities to the main working demographic at Hooters, women.

In the meantime, this lawsuit has advertised to far more people that the place has a children's menu.

The second amendment apparently includes a clause where it's obligatory to shoot oneself in the foot.

Rapscallion

[IDrinkaRum]

NOW believes the bibs Hooters sells which read "Future Hooters Girl" are bad for children

From the way the article reads, the organization is going after the Hooters restaurants located in San Francisco, San Bruno, Sacramento, and Orange County. The Hooters restaurants are classified as adult entertainment restaurants, and because they have a kids menu, high chairs, and other items that can make it seem "family friendly", it's actually violating state and local laws dealing with taking kids to sexually oriented places.

I have taken my daughter to Hooters 2 times so far. The first time, she was a little overwhelmed due to the loud noise and the fact she had never been there before. (Plus, as a matter of fact, she never once asked to go to the potty, which is a new feat for her).

Turns out, Child Rum loves Hooters! She likes their grilled cheese sandwiches, their chicken tenders, and their medium sauced drumsticks. I have no problem with taking her there. (Mr. Rum on the other hand is a horse of a different color).

So, what does everyone think? Should NOW be suing the restaurant? Should people be bringing their children to a "sexually oriented" restaurant (though I don't think it's that sexually oriented).