Intruding Prudes

[Boozy]

IMHO, it doesn't matter if she's hotter than, say, Cindy Crawford. She's already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that she's ugly on the inside.

Calling someone "ugly on the inside" is a personal attack and is against the rules of this forum.

It would have been nice if more than one person had bothered reporting this, but instead everyone chose to run with it and respond in the thread.

This thread is nearing the point of getting closed. That would be a shame, since there's potential for a thought-provoking and mature debate here.

Everyone needs to settle down and think before they post.

[Plaidman]

and where has he done that? i've seen him attack your views, but not you personally. at this point this thread has devolved from an attack on red panda's views (which is fine, and the purpose of this site) to personal attacks against her (which is against the rules of the site).

You're not exacty privy to our PM's or texts now are you?

[the_std]

I'm surprised by the people who apparently have such low self images about themselves that they think a person who is attractive must be vapid and only think about how hot she is. I do have other motivations in life you know. Just because I'm good looking it doesn't mean that is the only part of my personality nor does being less attractive automatically make you more intelligent or aware.

At least she has had the forthright not to do so.

Right. Telling people they disagree with her just because they have low self-image is not a personal attack in the slightest.

[linguist]

Strange views, seeing as you pretty much did attack me for my own views. Do you only do that to views you couldn't care less, and screw people who's views you disagree with?
.

and where has he done that? i've seen him attack your views, but not you personally. at this point this thread has devolved from an attack on red panda's views (which is fine, and the purpose of this site) to personal attacks against her (which is against the rules of the site).

[Plaidman]

Note: I don't condone or defend RP's actions, but I am defending her right to speak on this board without being attacked.

Strange views, seeing as you pretty much did attack me for my own views. Do you only do that to views you couldn't care less, and screw people who's views you disagree with?


As for Red Panda stating she only lives by her views and not the /masses/.

Well... I'm sure other's see the humor in the fact that she lives by what the media and hollywood portay that only the hotties deserve to do what they want. Since she (at least to herself) considers herself attractive on the outside, she MUST be the best.

[the_std]

So you DO think you're above the law.

I believe this qualifies as an "Oh snap!"

[Ladeeda]

How am I ugly on the inside? Because I am honest and live by a set of morals I made myself instead of mindlessly following the word of somebody else?

So you DO think you're above the law.

[Red Panda]

How am I ugly on the inside? Because I am honest and live by a set of morals I made myself instead of mindlessly following the word of somebody else?

[dendawg]

Remember, we haven't seen you. We don't know if you're actually hot, or if you're just saying you are. We also don't know if you'd be considered hot by each of our individual standards. In my personal experience, people who feel the need to tell others how attractive they are really don't have much in the way of other motivators in their lives.

IMHO, it doesn't matter if she's hotter than, say, Cindy Crawford. She's already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that she's ugly on the inside.

[Hobbs]

<snip>

You said it, we didn't.

And you're just proving everyone who... well, everyone but yourself correct. You are a vain, entitled exhibitionist.

Sorry red, but attacking everyone who disagrees, suggesting that we have lousy self image or are less attractive, just reeks of "neener neener, you're all just jealous!"

I'd hate to point it out, but from what I've witnessed in this thread, RP has presented her case as she sees it. Her detractors, however, have at times gone on to making personal attacks against her (I reported several). At least she has had the forthright not to do so.

Note: I don't condone or defend RP's actions, but I am defending her right to speak on this board without being attacked.

[Ladeeda]

Am I the only one who though that RP should be the weather girl on Naked News?

She gets to be naked in front of anyone that wants to see it,

and since her incredible powers of perfect weather forcasting is dependent on her being naked outside, she'll have the perfect job.

Decent money.
Being naked in front of people.
Hailed as the world expert on weather forcasting, simply by being naked. No amount of college was needed for her. The world rejoices.

...

Has anyone mentioned recently that you are a very intelligent person?

[Plaidman]

Am I the only one who though that RP should be the weather girl on Naked News?

She gets to be naked in front of anyone that wants to see it,

and since her incredible powers of perfect weather forcasting is dependent on her being naked outside, she'll have the perfect job.

Decent money.
Being naked in front of people.
Hailed as the world expert on weather forcasting, simply by being naked. No amount of college was needed for her. The world rejoices.

[KnitShoni]

I'm surprised by the people who apparently have such low self images about themselves that they think a person who is attractive must be vapid and only think about how hot she is. I do have other motivations in life you know. Just because I'm good looking it doesn't mean that is the only part of my personality nor does being less attractive automatically make you more intelligent or aware.

People are surprised about your obvious double standard. People are surprised that you apparently think laws and rules of common decency apparently don't apply to you. People are surprised that you automatically assume that because they disagree with your actions and the image you present, that means they are not attractive/less attractive/have a low self image. People (or, that may just be me) are surprised that you don't realize that, if you have to tell someone you have other motivations in life than how attractive you are, that means maybe you haven't really done a good job presenting yourself as a person with other motivations.

Some of us don't judge intelligence by attractiveness. Some of us do so based on the words spoken (or typed, in this case) and actions. Your words show you to be a narcissist who doesn't give a damn if you offend others with your actions, but heaven forbid others offend you for merely existing.

Remember, we haven't seen you. We don't know if you're actually hot, or if you're just saying you are. We also don't know if you'd be considered hot by each of our individual standards. In my personal experience, people who feel the need to tell others how attractive they are really don't have much in the way of other motivators in their lives.

[Ladeeda]

I'm surprised by the people who apparently have such low self images about themselves that they think a person who is attractive must be vapid and only think about how hot she is.

You said it, we didn't.

And you're just proving everyone who... well, everyone but yourself correct. You are a vain, entitled exhibitionist.

[Amanita]

My self image has nothing to do with the fact that I think you're in the wrong here. Regardless of whether you're the best looking thing ever, or morbidly obese, the laws concerning public nudity still apply. And when you are in a place where the public can see you and you are naked, that's breaking the law in many places.

Hell, even if I were the finest looking woman in the world with the best self-image, I would not be naked in public where others could see me, because I would not wish to break the law, or impose my nakedness on those who didn't wish to view it

Sorry red, but attacking everyone who disagrees, suggesting that we have lousy self image or are less attractive, just reeks of "neener neener, you're all just jealous!"